When it comes to the gene pool, there must be a chromosome that makes us read while we're walking. This is exactly what my daughter gets from me.
And, yeah, that's what I had been told: Baby walking, both in the time and the style, is as unique as personality. Sure-footedness, of course, isn't characteristic of my daughter, age 1 (which is why she is called a toddler). Being a fledgling toddler, Jasmine is eager to move around the room. That's pretty much every other new walkers does. But when it comes to her cruise control and reading mode, I can't help laughing.
"Oh, no, be careful," I told Jasmine when I saw her pick up a book or an instructional manual to "read" whilst she was making her way across the living room. Mind you, I didn't stop her from doing her style of walking-cum-reading trip. After all, her father does similar feat all the time.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Yes
I couldn't believe it when my brother brought me the book Difficult Conversations, before he knew that I'm going to take a mediation training course this month. This book might not be new to you, but in case it is I should say that it comes from the same group who wrote Getting to Yes.
Think about the last time you felt the urge to get your boss, your spouse, your friends or colleagues to say yes. It's no secret that today many of us feel that it's harder to negotiate and to foster a supportive environment when we need it most. It hurts.
Yeah, yeah. I know what you're thinking (after reading my last blog). And you're wrong. No, I am not learning to negotiate with my daughter. The truth is, believe me, a toddler is the most simple friend to go along with. What could be easier than to ask a toddler to say yes? Take a moment to teach a toddler to say yes or nod her head. Well, she might not follow - or she might just shake her head. Now, forget the teaching and simply play with a creative mind. Any imaginative game works; it really does. We showed Jasmine a little fairy Unazukin, a Japanese doll who reacts to voice by nodding and shaking her head. She loves that game. After talking to Unazukin and, hey presto, Jasmine learned to nod.
Think about the last time you felt the urge to get your boss, your spouse, your friends or colleagues to say yes. It's no secret that today many of us feel that it's harder to negotiate and to foster a supportive environment when we need it most. It hurts.
Yeah, yeah. I know what you're thinking (after reading my last blog). And you're wrong. No, I am not learning to negotiate with my daughter. The truth is, believe me, a toddler is the most simple friend to go along with. What could be easier than to ask a toddler to say yes? Take a moment to teach a toddler to say yes or nod her head. Well, she might not follow - or she might just shake her head. Now, forget the teaching and simply play with a creative mind. Any imaginative game works; it really does. We showed Jasmine a little fairy Unazukin, a Japanese doll who reacts to voice by nodding and shaking her head. She loves that game. After talking to Unazukin and, hey presto, Jasmine learned to nod.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Yes or No
Toddlers love to give "no" for an answer, and my daughter is no exception.
My nephew Ethan learned this fact when he came from the States to visit Jasmine. "Why does Jasmine shake her head every time I ask if she loves me?" Ethan wondered.
Yeah, when it comes to a one-year-old's way of communication, shaking head is much easier than nodding. I was trying to explain a toddler's difficulty with saying yes. Before I could convince Ethan, I found it difficult to convince myself, too. Many of us think that toddler is the only creature to keep saying no, but nothing could be further from truth.
As we grow up, we get glued to the answer "no." Saying yes has become an act of extreme courage, even for adults. Long before we could remember it, the all-purpose "No!" has ruled this world. If you don't believe me, ask your spouse (or your child) to keep a diary for one week and count the times you agree with her ideas. And, would you like to share with me your scores? "No!"
My nephew Ethan learned this fact when he came from the States to visit Jasmine. "Why does Jasmine shake her head every time I ask if she loves me?" Ethan wondered.
Yeah, when it comes to a one-year-old's way of communication, shaking head is much easier than nodding. I was trying to explain a toddler's difficulty with saying yes. Before I could convince Ethan, I found it difficult to convince myself, too. Many of us think that toddler is the only creature to keep saying no, but nothing could be further from truth.
As we grow up, we get glued to the answer "no." Saying yes has become an act of extreme courage, even for adults. Long before we could remember it, the all-purpose "No!" has ruled this world. If you don't believe me, ask your spouse (or your child) to keep a diary for one week and count the times you agree with her ideas. And, would you like to share with me your scores? "No!"
Saturday, December 18, 2010
We
I was asked to speak in a hospital forum about nonpunitive response to medical incidents. An apt illustration of the current climate comes from those stories in which honest doctors who make full confession find themselves viewed unfavourably. Should we then keep our mouths shut?
Hardly. There comes a time in the career of most doctors when things go badly awry. It comes earlier for those who work the hardest. No matter when it comes, however, the struggle is best overcome with support from the others. That's why I shared in the forum my way of handling my downright crestfallen colleague after a medical blunder. My usual response is a conscious effort to make use of the term we instead of the insulating pronoun you. "Did we forget to remove the tourniquet after blood taking?" is much preferred to "Did you leave the tourniquet on the patient’s arm?"
Wait. The human psychology of association behaviour is usually the other way round. Instead of linking ourselves to negative stigma, we tend to keep ourselves separate from the failure by the pronoun they. This is best shown by Robert Cialdini who did an experiment in which students at Arizona State University were phoned and asked to describe the outcome of a football game their school team had played a few weeks earlier. Some students were asked the result of a certain game their team had lost; the other students were asked the result of a different game that their school team had won.
How did the students describe the school team victory? "We beat Houston 17 to 14," or "We won."
How about the lost game? "They lost to Missouri, 30 to 20," or "I don't know the score, but Arizona State got beat." And, do you know what the most remarkable answer was like?
"They threw away our chance for a national championship!"
Hardly. There comes a time in the career of most doctors when things go badly awry. It comes earlier for those who work the hardest. No matter when it comes, however, the struggle is best overcome with support from the others. That's why I shared in the forum my way of handling my downright crestfallen colleague after a medical blunder. My usual response is a conscious effort to make use of the term we instead of the insulating pronoun you. "Did we forget to remove the tourniquet after blood taking?" is much preferred to "Did you leave the tourniquet on the patient’s arm?"
Wait. The human psychology of association behaviour is usually the other way round. Instead of linking ourselves to negative stigma, we tend to keep ourselves separate from the failure by the pronoun they. This is best shown by Robert Cialdini who did an experiment in which students at Arizona State University were phoned and asked to describe the outcome of a football game their school team had played a few weeks earlier. Some students were asked the result of a certain game their team had lost; the other students were asked the result of a different game that their school team had won.
How did the students describe the school team victory? "We beat Houston 17 to 14," or "We won."
How about the lost game? "They lost to Missouri, 30 to 20," or "I don't know the score, but Arizona State got beat." And, do you know what the most remarkable answer was like?
"They threw away our chance for a national championship!"
Friday, December 17, 2010
Farewell
"Will you still go to our departmental Xmas party?" It was the shaky voice of my colleague after attending the funeral service of my respectable patient last night.
I said yes. It wasn't that I did not shiver after temperature plunged from 20 degrees Celsius to five degrees. I did. No, the uneasy feeling of transit from a memorial service to a social event with party theme is difficult to shake off. And, I didn't miss the party that much. Going to say goodbye to my patient is even more meaningful. After looking after my patient for few months, I had never realized how awe-inspiring he was – not until I heard the obituary read by his daughter. It's really hard to say that I looked after him when I found out I knew so little about my patient before.
Actually, I'm going to say that I started to love my patient since last night.
I said yes. It wasn't that I did not shiver after temperature plunged from 20 degrees Celsius to five degrees. I did. No, the uneasy feeling of transit from a memorial service to a social event with party theme is difficult to shake off. And, I didn't miss the party that much. Going to say goodbye to my patient is even more meaningful. After looking after my patient for few months, I had never realized how awe-inspiring he was – not until I heard the obituary read by his daughter. It's really hard to say that I looked after him when I found out I knew so little about my patient before.
Actually, I'm going to say that I started to love my patient since last night.
Friday, December 10, 2010
Review
A recent British Medical Journal commentary argued about the fairest peer review system in biomedical publication.
Peer review system has been a time-honoured process of evaluating scientific manuscripts; qualified individuals within a relevant field are often invited to critique and comment upon a submitted manuscript (without monetary reward or academic recognition, in case you're interested to know) before the editors make a final decision to publish it or not.
Is it fair? Not even close. No, it's not fair; but it is a fact. Peer review is done by and large anonymously. It is never easy to be objective. The first sense to judge a manuscript is, if I'm being honest, the stomach. I'm serious. It occurs right in the pit of my stomach when I first judge a manuscript. I listen more to my stomach, far ahead of my heart of hearts, and definitely above my brain, if at all. Unsettling as it is, psychological evidence indicates that we experience our feelings toward something a split second before we can intellectualise about it.
I remember quite well my stomach feeling early this week, after accepting an invitation to review a manuscript submitted to the journal Peritoneal Dialysis International. I didn't know the authors, but my stomach tightened as soon as I read their cover letter. "On behalf of all the authors, I would like to ask you to consider our manuscript entitled XXX for publication in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology as a case report." All at once, things began to make sense. These were people (or lazy slug, dare I say) who submitted their manuscript to a far more prestigious journal, got rejected, and submitted the whole stuff unchanged (including the cover letter) to a second medical journal.
A decision was made before I read further.
Peer review system has been a time-honoured process of evaluating scientific manuscripts; qualified individuals within a relevant field are often invited to critique and comment upon a submitted manuscript (without monetary reward or academic recognition, in case you're interested to know) before the editors make a final decision to publish it or not.
Is it fair? Not even close. No, it's not fair; but it is a fact. Peer review is done by and large anonymously. It is never easy to be objective. The first sense to judge a manuscript is, if I'm being honest, the stomach. I'm serious. It occurs right in the pit of my stomach when I first judge a manuscript. I listen more to my stomach, far ahead of my heart of hearts, and definitely above my brain, if at all. Unsettling as it is, psychological evidence indicates that we experience our feelings toward something a split second before we can intellectualise about it.
I remember quite well my stomach feeling early this week, after accepting an invitation to review a manuscript submitted to the journal Peritoneal Dialysis International. I didn't know the authors, but my stomach tightened as soon as I read their cover letter. "On behalf of all the authors, I would like to ask you to consider our manuscript entitled XXX for publication in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology as a case report." All at once, things began to make sense. These were people (or lazy slug, dare I say) who submitted their manuscript to a far more prestigious journal, got rejected, and submitted the whole stuff unchanged (including the cover letter) to a second medical journal.
A decision was made before I read further.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Happy Birthday Jasmine
On the same afternoon in 2009, I was reading What to Expect the First Year, eager to set the stage for Jasmine's arrival. One year later, I brought Jasmine to her first preschool playing class today, carrying with me the special TimeFrames issue. That's an issue devoted to looking back at the stories of the past decade (and what it might presage about the future).
After taking a quick look at the Time magazine's content, I began to realize that quite a lot of changes have occurred since the start of the millennium. Understandable? Definitely, when I consider how many things have changed within just one year of Jasmine's birth. Never before have so many delightful moments of parenting been known to me. And never before have I witnessed so many new skills acquired by a human being within a matter of twelve months.
A year brimming with big surprises, I must say. Though it seems like just yesterday (okay, maybe the day before yesterday) when Jasmine mastered the skill of rolling over, my daughter has run around our living room umpteen times before I finished the first paragraph of this blog.
I can admit it freely now. I didn't think too much about having a baby. I couldn't have been more wrong.
After taking a quick look at the Time magazine's content, I began to realize that quite a lot of changes have occurred since the start of the millennium. Understandable? Definitely, when I consider how many things have changed within just one year of Jasmine's birth. Never before have so many delightful moments of parenting been known to me. And never before have I witnessed so many new skills acquired by a human being within a matter of twelve months.
A year brimming with big surprises, I must say. Though it seems like just yesterday (okay, maybe the day before yesterday) when Jasmine mastered the skill of rolling over, my daughter has run around our living room umpteen times before I finished the first paragraph of this blog.
I can admit it freely now. I didn't think too much about having a baby. I couldn't have been more wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)